"The moral duty of the free writer is to begin his work at home: to be a critic of his own community, his own country, his own government, his own culture"~Edward Abbey

Friday, May 05, 2006

Somethng for Nothing

The other night while watching T.V. my mom and I saw a clip of a Barry Bonds' at bat. She remarked that no-one seems to be held accountable anymore. I initially agreed with her of course but on further reflection realized that this is precisely what both conservativism and liberalism in modern america are selling (What follows are essentially straw men of conservatism and liberalsim used to try to show a connection. I do not claim to grasp the whole of either ideology).

What passes for conservatism in taliking head american politics is essentially profit without consequences. We are taught that we can make more and have more without the consequences of environmental damage, alliances with corrupt third world dictators that ensure our easy access to resources and production, and the damage that affluence can do to our social and spiritual connections.

What passes for liberalism with it's "defend the sexual revolution at all cost" (Crunchy Con) ethos tells us that we will not have to deal with any consequences for removing sex from it's proper place (the marriage bed).

The problem is that neither one is a solution for each other. The exmeplar of poverty in America is the single mother. Both conservatism and liberalism are to be blaimed for this because we have an economy which has not only created ghetto's but now outsourced them. By making profit the ultimate goal of business we have allowed corporations to exist that feel more accountable to their shareholders than to their employees or the people providing the resources neccesary to do business. But, we have another problem because we allow a culture of sexual promiscuity which does not see a problem with meaningless sexual hook ups ewven if they do create life. Indeed the one night stand might be the perfect embodiment of late capitalism.

In neither of these political streams is the discussion based around the needs of society or our neighbors. The goal is profit and expansion not health. The goal is satisfaction and freedom not, well, health. We have somehow believed we have modernized ourselves into individuality were
we only have to be concerned about how our actions effect us.

What needs to change is where our reasnoning starts from. Our thought process should begin with the Kingdom of God with a desire to see the world as such a place where each person, plant, and animal is respected and cared for. In a religiously pluralist society we can call this the commonwealth. We should conduct our business and our sexuality with a desire to create a culture and economy which is most generous and healty for all.

I sometimes think that we trick ourselves into thinking that we can't do more. We think that global poverty and deteriorating sexual mores are beyond any help and this isn't so. If you are concerned about how consumerism teaches us to view people as disposable asssets; marry and a raise a family. If you are angry about the high rate of divorce and children born out of wedlock; then invest in companies which will stay in one place long term and provide stability for a community.

Ultimately it leads to making a choice, a choice that no political leader on the right or the left would ever ask us to make, choosing to sacrifice.

"The most alarming sign of the state of our society now is that our leaders have the courage to sacrifice the lives of young people in war but have not the courage to tell us that we must be less greedy and less wasteful" ~Wendell Berry

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

If raising a family and growing a garden is the way to glorify god, lets do it. I'll just have to work on this green thumb of mine.

Angela

8:19 PM

 
Blogger Matt Lyke said...

All human activity is the way to glorify God. But I really think that it is not only the most pius politics but the most practical which are constituted by the family and local care for life

7:49 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Last night I found myself sitting around with four young Canadian women, on a three-week vacation to Egypt, all dressed inappropriately for their context. After they left, I had some very good, honest conversation with the Egyptian couple, the American single woman, and the (absolutely warm and funny and wonderful) visiting Jordanian Catholic Bedouin man who were also there in George's living room.... I find myself disgusted by this culture in which sexual repression rears its ugly head in the most paltry, sad, and violent ways, a culture in which women who do not cover their hair are considered "loose," a culture where 90% of women endure genital mutilation. At the same time, I found myself annoyed by the immaturity and disrespect of the North American women and knew that I will have a hard time adjusting to dress and to the general casualness with which people over there go about their sexual affairs.

Anyway, men in both cultures are looking at the same pornography.

This doesn't relate quite so directly to capitalism or American politics, but, you know. Neither of these cultures, I think, generally operates out of a sense of care, or respect, or loving commitment.

4:41 AM

 
Blogger Matt Lyke said...

From the context clues I'm going to guess that this is Miss Saylor. In my mind at the root I don't think the problem is capatalism. I would consider myself a proponent of the market (but not a completely unrestricted "free market"). I think the problem is commodification of creation. We are taught that everything is a resource to be used and thrown out at our discretion. It's the same with oil reserves in the artic and the pretty girl at the party (for example).

By the way, what's the difference between a love song and a hymn again?

6:14 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are real smart with context clues.

Tonight, I had dinner with an American and a.... guy from Cameroon. Cameroonian? Anyway. Simplice (is that not, like, the greatest name ever?) was talking about how his grandfather had seven wives and all the financial transactions that go into that.

YIKES.

First of all, love songs are the ones that should make you vomit and hymns are the ones that should put you to sleep. Second of all, ask Flannery O'Connor. It's a line from her short story Temple of the Holy Spirit (I THINK that's the one it's from and I THINK that's the title), which, interestingly enough, might sort of coincide with this whole post. Third of all, there IS no difference IF you're talking about Over the Rhine.

1:31 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home